• Skip to main content

Blockchain Weekly

Blockchain Weekly Tech Edition

  • Home
  • Arts & Culture
  • Comedy
  • Entertainment

cryptography

Dec 07 2021

Blockchain Vs. Quantum Computing: Is Quantum Computing the Biggest Threat to Crypto?

Blockchain Vs. Quantum Computing Is Quantum Computing the Biggest Threat to Crypto

Blockchain vs. Quantum computing is a technological confrontation. For the crypto sector, quantum clouds are forming on the horizon. Significant advances in quantum computing may theoretically derail the entire cryptocurrency sector, just as the emerging blockchain technology is gaining traction. However, quantum-proof coding is already in the developing stage by crypto experts.  

Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (BTC) and others are developed on blockchain technology. It operates by dividing data into chunks that are then encrypted. This encryption enables financial transactions to be carried out without involving other beneficiaries such as banks and governments. It is also what quantum computing has the potential to reveal. By adding their incredible power to the process, quantum computers have the potential to revolutionize the way pharmaceuticals and products are designed. 

So what’s the issue? The issue is that the blockchain accounting systems that supports cryptocurrencies may be vulnerable to sophisticated threats and forgery, if quantum computing progresses faster than the efforts to future-proof digital money.  

Is quantum computing a threat to cryptography?

If you thought blockchain technology was difficult to grasp, quantum computing is an entirely different topic. Because quantum is easy to propose, it could transform everything. But this isn’t entirely accurate. 

Quantum computing will resolve problems much more quickly than present computers- a million times faster. 

Quantum computers may be particularly good at cracking cryptographic passwords, posing a new cryptographic challenge. Cryptocurrencies are secured via a technique known as public-key cryptography. The technology encrypts your messages and secures your online transactions so that the only intended recipient may view them. The system functions by combining a public key that anybody can view with a private key that only the owner can see. If the present development continues, quantum computing will crack public key encryption, posing a serious threat to the crypto industry. It will affect not only cryptocurrency trading but also currencies worth hundreds of billions of dollars. 

Quantum computers manipulate data stored on qubits, which are materials like altered atoms subject to the odd physics that govern the ultrasmall. Quantum computers , for example, will require thousands of qubits to crack encryption, significantly more than today’s devices. Machines will also require permanent qubits, which will allow them to execute computations for significantly longer periods than is currently possible. 

Makers of quantum computers, on the other hand, are working hard to fix these flaws. For example, they are cramming more qubits into computers and developing quantum error correction methods to aid qubits in doing more complex and lengthier operations. 

“We think that sufficiently powerful computers will be available” for breaking blockchains open within a few years, according to Nir Minerbi, CEO of quantum software company Classiq Technologies. 

What does this signify for Bitcoin and cryptocurrency investors?

The good news is that this is a well-documented issue. And it won’t happen tonight that quantum computers be able to crack encryption right away. Instead, we will know long before it happens, according to computer specialists.

More interestingly, blockchain technology is emerging simultaneously as quantum computing. Some programmers are already considering post-quantum cryptography. This is strengthening encryption that quantum computers can’t crack, and experts believe that they will attain success.

However, one of the most compelling features of blockchain is its almost untraversable security. At the very least, the risk of breaching such protection is concerning, and crypto investors should keep an eye on quantum advances. 

Cryptocurrencies may need to update to post-quantum cryptography methods on an individual basis. It will be interesting to see which digital currency ventures manage to remain ahead of the curve. 

Cryptocurrency investors will probably need to shift their assets to more secure wallets at some point. And, given that data firm Chainalysis believes that 20% of Bitcoin is presently missing or held in wallets that individuals can’t access, these untransferable currencies may be more vulnerable to threats. 

It will most likely be easier to handle the transformation if you store your assets with a crypto exchange. However, if you store your crypto assets in a decentralized wallet, you may need to be extra vigilant.

Quantum computing’s ominous shadow

Regulators are generally cited as the greatest threat to cryptocurrency, but other technologies also pose a concern. For example, other technologies that render blockchain obsolete may emerge, just like Bitcoin did 12 years ago. Or else remove withdraw cryptography protocol from cryptocurrencies, like with quantum computing. 

Existing cryptocurrency initiatives are already dealing with a slew of issues, ranging from scalability to long-term viability. However, given the magnitude of the threat, the industry must act quickly to guarantee that quantum computing does not imperil the security that forms its basis. 

Resolving the quantum computing issue with cryptocurrency

The best part for the cryptocurrency enthusiasts is that the quantum computing problem can be overcome by using the same post-quantum cryptography technologies that the software industry is exploring right now. To keep ahead of the curve, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) of the United States has been collaborating with experts from all around the world for several years to build a quantum proof cryptography algorithms. 

Several Bitcoin and blockchain projects, for example, are actively developing quantum-resistant software:

  • The Ethereum project successfully established the second-largest cryptocurrency in terms of total value behind Bitcoin. It has now begun to map a post-quantum path. At the StarkWare conference in 2019, Justin Drake ,an Ethereum Foundation researcher, discussed quantum resistance concepts in Ethereum 3.0. But that’s probably a long way off. The shift from Ethereum 1.0 to Ethereum 2.0 will be worth waiting for. 
  • A merger of Cambridge Quantum Computing and Honeywell is working on quantum security technology that can deploy to any blockchain network. It visions to protect the connections between machines that store blockchain data and the signatures required to encrypt and sign the data. 

 

  • For the quantum computing age, several people are developing new cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology. For example, Quantum Resistant Ledger and Bitcoin Post Quantum are unrelated to the original Bitcoin money despite their names. To defend against future quantum breaking, these attempts use post-quantum algorithms.  
  • According to Hyperledger’s executive director, Daniela Barbosa, the Hyperlegder Foundation, an open-source software initiative aiming at corporate uses of blockchain, has begun working on post-quantum cryptography through its Ursa effort. Ursa is a cryptographic software package that Hyperledger projects may deploy. 

According to Peter Chapman, CEO of quantum computer manufacturer IonQ, one issue with current post-quantum cryptography methods is that they frequently demand big numeric encryption keys and lengthier processing times. This might result in a significant rise in the amount of computing power required to host blockchains. 

Issues with Decentralized governance

From the point of view of the chief technical officer of Permission.io, Hunter Jensen, a firm that utilizes bitcoin for a tailored advertising system, the true quantum test for cryptocurrencies is not the advancing technology but the governance structures. 

Many cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, are designed to be decentralized, with anyone who joins the network effectively administering it. However, people willing to optimize cryptocurrency’s inner workings must persuade more than half of its members to fork the coin into a new version. 

Such governance might reward cryptocurrencies with greater central authority, such as Dash with its masternodes or even “govcoins” circulated by central banks, which can theoretically move faster to provide post-quantum security. However, it poses a problem in the crypto community, that constantly opposes the concept of authority. 

According to Andersen Cheng, CEO of London-based business, Post Quantum (dealing with post-quantum encryption technology), “If their communities are too sluggish and unorganised to adapt, it will be the actual decentralized currencies that will be affected.” 

Other cryptocurrency-related quantum issues

Another threat is that blockchains rely on hashing, a type of digital fingerprinting that quantum computer might disrupt. However this is likely to be remedied with relatively modest technological advancements. 

Quantum computing may be vulnerable to bitcoin wallets, which users use to keep track of their digital possessions. These wallets hold individuals’ private keys to access their blockchain assets. A successful attack might result in the nullification of a wallet. 

Then how do you make users upgrade their keys? Well, the answer is not so simple and it is perhaps the most hazardous aspect. According to Joe Genereux, a senior cryptography and security engineer at browser creator Brave, explained how the company’s own Basic Attention Token (BAT) cryptocurrency is used for a user-paying ad system. The cryptocurrencies with stronger governance or post-quantum designs built in from the start will be able to avoid this problem. 

However, according to David Sacco, a professor at the University of New Haven, cryptocurrency’s organic, self-directed evolution predicts that individuals would upgrade the digital asset technology to overcome quantum computing’s hurdles. He explains ” that the significance of this ecosystem is that anyone who understands the technology can use it.”

Conclusion

Several websites are prepared to connect you to thousands of coins all across the world. And, in order to choose the best one for you, you must first choose which features are most important to you. 

You can even dig into some cryptocurrency courses and blockchain course. These courses are designed to provide you with a better understanding of the technology along with obtaining a professional certification. If you still cannot get enough with cryptocurrency learning, you can seek guidance from experts. A lot of companies have entered the market that provide expert solutions along with certification programs.

%post_title%

Blockchain Weekly Source

Written by blockchainwee · Categorized: blockchain technology, Blockchain Weekly, Blockchain Weekly Tech, crypto, Cryptocurrency, cryptography · Tagged: Blockchain, blockchain technology, crypto, Cryptocurrency, cryptography

Nov 15 2021

Blockchain & Database: Difference disclosed

Blockchain & Database Difference disclosed

The current era is the era of digitization. Everything is getting into digital form. Even the currency has become digital and the transactions too. Recent times are witnessing a constant rise in the use of cryptocurrency. Bitcoin is no longer unknown. And those familiar with Bitcoin, are also familiar with Blockchain technology. It has surfaced significant developments in the digital transaction era despite being in a budding state. 

If we talk about blockchain, it is a technique used for storing information in a way that making amendments, hacking, or evading the system seems nearly impossible. It is a type of digital ledger of transactions distributed and replicated across the entire network architecture of systems on the blockchain.

Because of its varied applications, exponentially surge in popularity, and the salient similarities they share, many beginners wonder about the differences between a blockchain and a database. The similarity traits that a blockchain and a database share, often confuse the novices to believe blockchain is another kind of database. Even so, several aspects make blockchain more than just a database. 

Understanding Blockchain

As mentioned earlier, Blockchain is a digital ledger technology that stores records of crypto transactions. The information is stored in the form of a chain of uniform size blocks, hence the name blockchain. This makes the stored information almost impossible to be hacked, amended, or swindled.  

Blockchain deploys a decentralized network, that is the data and information stored on the network are shared amongst all the users on the network and are verified by them. Precisely, blockchain uses a peer-to-peer (P2P) based network architecture. The information stored in the data structure known as blocks is distributed across a mass of computers not owned by a sole entity. Blocks carry a series of valid transactions that are hashed and enciphered into a Merkle tree. The hashed information from the previous blocks links the blocks to each other. Hash is a unique code that helps to identify blocks. A one-way hash function, SHA 256 hashing algorithm is used by blockchain hashing. The blocks are usually digitally signed to assure the integrity of the block and the information stored in it. 

Benefits of using blockchain

Here are some advantages of using blockchain technology:

  • Decentralized: Decentralized means that there is no bossing around by a sole entity. The network has a set of protocols on how to exchange information and everyone enjoys an equal status in the network.
  • Economic: Deploying decentralized networks allows the organizations to cut expenses on IT staffing, maintenance, security, infrastructure, and more
  • Secure: Since all the blocks in the blockchain are hashed to each other, tampering with the information is not easy. To make sure that the information is properly sealed inside the blocks, blockchain uses advanced cryptography. And the distributed ledger technology provides every peer on the network with the original copy of the information so that in the case of multiple nodes failure, the system remains active. 
  • Flexible: There are three categories of blockchain- private, public, and hybrid. The organization can choose the blockchain that suits the best to accomplish its set goals.  
  • Transparent: As the information stored is shared amongst all the users on the network, this maintains transparency and trust in the system.
  • Time reduction: Transferring money using traditional banking methods can be a lengthy and time-consuming process. But with the use of blockchain technology, instant transfer of money is possible from anywhere in the world. 
  • Unalterable transactions: The information stored in blocks in the blockchain network is unchangeable. The information can only be stored in the blocks. Furthermore, it neither can be altered, nor deleted. 

Understanding a Database

A database is a systematic collection of data that is stored and retrieved using a computer system. It is a data structure that allows us to store and work with data. A database works on a centralized network that is operated by an administrator who has the permissions to read, write, update and delete stored data in the database. Any modification at the server system automatically gets updated in the entire network. 

As the current data have become much more complex, a typical database deploys a client-server architecture. The server acts as the host in the database and the client as the user. The client requests access to the data. The client can also make modifications to the stored data only if it is authorized by the server to do so. 

Financial records of an institution, ledgers in the banks, can be considered as examples of a database controlled by an administrative authority. 

Benefits of using a database

Check the list of advantages of using blockchain technology:

  • Multi-user interface: Database offers different types of user interfaces like APIs (Application Program Interface) and GUIs (Graphical User Interface)
  • Flexibility: Database is more flexible towards customization. Since the conventional databases are administered and controlled midway, authorizations, advantages, and set-up requirements can be advanced. Besides, the information can be easily repositioned, on account of backup exercises and relational architecture.  
  • Backup and Recovery: The database recovery subsystems create an automatic backup of the stored information so that in the case of software failure, errors, or any other mishap, the data remains secure and easily accessible. 
  • Stability: The database structure is based on centralized network architecture and the administrator is the central authority to access and modify data, it is capable of handling a large capacity of transactions per second. The client-server architecture discards the requirement for hubs and replaces them with a standalone base.  
  • Speed delivery: The conventional databases used to be very sluggish. However, there has been a significant improvement in the database delivery speed and high-tech operations over the years. 

Blockchain vs Database

There is no doubt that blockchain and database share significant similarities, but the aspects that make blockchain different from a database cannot be ignored. Following are the paramount differences between the two:

Architecture: 

One of the important difference between blockchain and a database is the type of architecture used by the two. Blockchain uses distributed ledger technology that is DTL. Precisely, it is a peer-to-peer network where all the nodes share equal permissions and responsibilities. Each node has a copy of the original data, and thus each node can act as a server. Each node can verify the transactions over the network and perform data mining operations also. Cryptographic protocols are used to enhance security.

On the other hand, a database structure is based on a client-server architecture where a particular system acts as the server and the remaining systems as the client. Such type of architecture has proven to be beneficial for both small-scale and large-scale organizations. In such a network the server is controlled by an administrator that can read, write, alter or delete the data, and the client act as the user that requests for information.

Control:

One of the significant aspects of blockchain vs database is the type of control that these technologies have on the network. Blockchain is designed in such a way that the control over the data in the database remains decentralized. In other words, every system in the network has equal control over the data without the need for central control. To add any information in the blocks, the majority of nodes must concord with each other. This guarantees the security of the system.

On the other hand, a database is based on centralized control where a single entity controls the data and information stored in the database. Traditional databases are physically controlled on one server by an administrator. The administrator controls the information on the network. Apart from this, the administrator can control the activities of the client systems and cannot download the database until authorized to do so. Hence, the authority to run, manage and control the database is either entitled to a single person or a few people. 

Permissions:

In a traditional database, permissions are required to access the data. The types of permission granted over a database are read, write, update and delete. The administrator of the database authorizes the clients or the users with the permissions to be used by them. The clients must validate their credentials with the administrator to get access to the database. This way the access to the database is limited and controlled.

In contrast, blockchain is a permissionless network and there are no set rules for accessing the information. In Blockchain, every node has an original copy of the data, and information can be accessed by any node instantly. However, altering the information on the blockchain is not easily possible. 

Design structure:

Blockchain is designed in a way that hampering data on the network is not possible. Since, the blockchain stores information in the form of a chain of blocks where each block is linked to another block, data can be easily added into the chain but cannot be altered, or deleted. The past information and the relevant present information exist together. The information in blockchain is in real-time which makes it helpful in tracking the records and authenticity of a product. 

On the other hand, databases are structured to add, modify and delete information. The information that is up to date at a particular moment is available for access. It gives a snapshot of the present data.

Security:

Another important aspect to be considered is the blockchain vs database argument. Blockchain is comparatively much more secure than a database. Blockchain functions by providing the original copy of the information to all the nodes for certifying the blocks, instead of relying on the primary server. In case of any unreliable information, the technology automatically identifies the abnormalities and rectifies them.

However, the information stored on a database cannot be guaranteed security. A single loophole in the information system can leverage hackers and pryers and result in false modification and loss of information.

Tolerance:

The architecture of blockchain makes it a fault-tolerant technology. Since the information is shared amongst all the nodes, any type of software failure or error cannot disrupt the working of the entire system. 

Whereas, in a database, if the server suffers from a failure, the entire system gets disturbed. Even the unavailability of the control authority can lead to operational failures. 

Conclusion

To sum up, blockchain technology offers many benefits over database technology. There are a lot of similarities between the two which makes novices consider blockchain as another type of database, but the significant differences prove that blockchain and a database are different technologies. The organization is free to choose from either of the technologies according to its set goals.

%post_title%

Blockchain Weekly Source

Written by blockchainwee · Categorized: Bitcoin, blockchain cryptography, blockchain technology, Blockchain Weekly, Blockchain Weekly Tech, cryptography, database, Distributed ledger technology · Tagged: Bitcoin, Blockchain, blockchain cryptography, blockchain technology, cryptography, database, Distributed ledger technology

Copyright © 2023 · Altitude Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in